Running Head : work ReviewIntroduction To Quality Assurance - purpose ReviewOutcomes of Concurrent Utilization ReviewIntroductionThe value of employment management and disapproval has been debated among the leaders in health c ar since its blood . The priming coat of use round is the cost containment for payers and streamlined use of goods and services of infirmary resources while providing quality health succeed to the patients The process of utilization followup involves independent review of clinical examination selective information and the recommended lot by the provider . The deployment of RN s at some(prenominal) ends - the provider and payer- is to ensure that proper economic aid is taken to review the care plan lasts of the provider originally a yell is deniedThree strengths of concurrent utilization re viewSome of the hearty strengths of utilization review are : reduction of health care cost to the payer pursue dog turn out and businesslike utilization of to a greater extent but resources . It has been be through several studies that utilization review resulted in bring down costs to the payer (Murray ,2001 . The other suggested strength is that thither may be a watch dog effect that takes dwelling when providers are aware that their resource utilization is creation monitored . This may result in patients and /or physicians choose more efficient options . The other important strength of utilization review is the efficient utilization of more scarce resources like hospital work by reducing the Length of Stay in a hospitalTwo weaknesses of concurrent utilization review which you believe to be a significant issueConcurrent utilization review involves deployment of more RN s on both sides - the payer and provider for review of clinical selective information and process ing of take aims . This is an issue at a ! limit where the availability of RN s is in short supply .
By deploying and thus diverting important resources like RN s , the costly services of RN s are underutilized This is difficult to compensate for in view of an already existing resource crunchAnother issue is the beat involved in utilization reviews and the difficulty and division of finality making . Time is of essence in health care especially where critical decisivenesss needed to be taken . any(prenominal) control in processing and subsequent denial of claim may result in inappropriate or slight favourable health care options for the patient This may result in poor service to the patient and / or special monetary burden depending upon the insurance coverage options . Bickman Karver , and Schut (1997 ) illustrated the difficulty and variability of decision making about appropriateness of care . Clinicians were granted clinical case pros of children with a psychiatric illness Clinicians were accordingly asked to particularise the client to the appropriate level of care (outpatient therapy , mediocre nonresidential care intermediate residential care , residential interference center , or inpatient care ) victimisation their way of life s level-of-care guidelines . The clinician ratings had an interrater reliability of almost zero .These weaknesses have the dominance of undermining the utilization management review process itselfIn your opinion , what was the most significant finding from the subject study . justify your point and controvert any policy...If you want to get a climb essay, severalize it on our webs ite: OrderCust! omPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment